MU vs QCOM
Micron Technology (MU) and Qualcomm (QCOM) compared side by side. Micron Technology (MU) is larger, with a market cap of $992.9B versus $187.8B for Qualcomm, about 5.3 times the size. On trailing earnings, MU is cheaper at 11.8x versus 20.4x for QCOM.
Head to head
| Metric | MU | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $992.9B | $187.8B |
| P/E (TTM) | 11.8x | 20.4x |
| Forward P/E | 4.2x | 17.3x |
| Revenue (TTM) | $133.2B | $44.1B |
| Revenue growth | 379.3% | -4.0% |
| Gross margin | 80.7% | 54.2% |
| Operating margin | 80.7% | 18.5% |
| Free cash flow | $59.0B | $10.4B |
| Dividend yield | 0.07% | 2.09% |
| 1-year return | +325.0% | +5.6% |
| 5-year return (annual) | +67.8% | +8.3% |
| Max drawdown | -98% | -87% |
| FI Handbook grade | B+ | B |
Highlighted: the stronger figure on metrics where higher or lower is clearly better.
Growth of $10,000 (5 years, price only)
MU vs QCOM FAQ
Which is bigger, MU or QCOM?
Micron Technology (MU) is larger, with a market cap of $992.9B versus $187.8B for Qualcomm, about 5.3 times the size.
Is MU or QCOM cheaper?
On trailing earnings, MU is cheaper at 11.8x versus 20.4x for QCOM. A lower P/E can reflect slower expected growth, so compare growth and margins too.
Which stock performed better over the past year, MU or QCOM?
MU returned +325.0% over the past year including dividends, versus +5.6% for QCOM, through October 23, 2026.
Which pays a higher dividend, MU or QCOM?
QCOM yields 2.09% versus 0.07% for MU.
Full pages: Micron Technology · Qualcomm