MNST vs PEP
Monster Beverage (MNST) and PepsiCo (PEP) compared side by side. PepsiCo (PEP) is larger, with a market cap of $185.0B versus $90.5B for Monster Beverage, about 2.0 times the size. On trailing earnings, PEP is cheaper at 17.1x versus 42.8x for MNST.
Head to head
| Metric | MNST | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $90.5B | $185.0B |
| P/E (TTM) | 42.8x | 17.1x |
| Forward P/E | 35.3x | 15.7x |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.2B | $98.2B |
| Revenue growth | 20.2% | 5.6% |
| Gross margin | 55.5% | 54.3% |
| Operating margin | 29.2% | 16.9% |
| Free cash flow | $2.1B | $10.5B |
| Dividend yield | None | 4.36% |
| 1-year return | +32.2% | -6.8% |
| 5-year return (annual) | +16.9% | -0.0% |
| Max drawdown | -96% | -66% |
| FI Handbook grade | B- | B- |
Highlighted: the stronger figure on metrics where higher or lower is clearly better.
Growth of $10,000 (5 years, price only)
MNST vs PEP FAQ
Which is bigger, MNST or PEP?
PepsiCo (PEP) is larger, with a market cap of $185.0B versus $90.5B for Monster Beverage, about 2.0 times the size.
Is MNST or PEP cheaper?
On trailing earnings, PEP is cheaper at 17.1x versus 42.8x for MNST. A lower P/E can reflect slower expected growth, so compare growth and margins too.
Which stock performed better over the past year, MNST or PEP?
MNST returned +32.2% over the past year including dividends, versus -6.8% for PEP, through October 23, 2026.
Which pays a higher dividend, MNST or PEP?
PEP yields 4.36%; MNST does not pay a dividend.
Full pages: Monster Beverage · PepsiCo