LRCX vs TER

Lam Research (LRCX) and Teradyne (TER) compared side by side. Lam Research (LRCX) is larger, with a market cap of $288.0B versus $48.3B for Teradyne, about 6.0 times the size. On trailing earnings, LRCX is cheaper at 34.3x versus 42.4x for TER.

Head to head

MetricLRCXTER
Market cap$288.0B$48.3B
P/E (TTM)34.3x42.4x
Forward P/E18.9x26.9x
Revenue (TTM)$26.1B$4.5B
Revenue growth54.4%103.9%
Gross margin51.1%59.2%
Operating margin40.0%33.2%
Free cash flow$4.9B$799.9M
Dividend yield0.57%0.17%
1-year return+56.7%+113.4%
5-year return (annual)+34.2%+22.1%
Max drawdown-88%-97%
FI Handbook gradeB+B+

Highlighted: the stronger figure on metrics where higher or lower is clearly better.

Growth of $10,000 (5 years, price only)

$0
$25.0K
$50.0K
$75.0K
20222023202420252026
LRCXTER

LRCX vs TER FAQ

Which is bigger, LRCX or TER?

Lam Research (LRCX) is larger, with a market cap of $288.0B versus $48.3B for Teradyne, about 6.0 times the size.

Is LRCX or TER cheaper?

On trailing earnings, LRCX is cheaper at 34.3x versus 42.4x for TER. A lower P/E can reflect slower expected growth, so compare growth and margins too.

Which stock performed better over the past year, LRCX or TER?

TER returned +113.4% over the past year including dividends, versus +56.7% for LRCX, through October 23, 2026.

Which pays a higher dividend, LRCX or TER?

LRCX yields 0.57% versus 0.17% for TER.

Full pages: Lam Research · Teradyne