GWW vs SNA

W. W. Grainger (GWW) and Snap-on (SNA) compared side by side. W. W. Grainger (GWW) is larger, with a market cap of $63.6B versus $18.5B for Snap-on, about 3.4 times the size. On trailing earnings, SNA is cheaper at 18.5x versus 34.4x for GWW.

Head to head

MetricGWWSNA
Market cap$63.6B$18.5B
P/E (TTM)34.4x18.5x
Forward P/E26.4x17.0x
Revenue (TTM)$18.8B$5.3B
Revenue growth10.3%-0.7%
Gross margin39.4%51.9%
Operating margin16.1%24.9%
Free cash flow$1.5B$1.1B
Dividend yield0.74%2.73%
1-year return+41.2%+5.8%
5-year return (annual)+26.5%+14.1%
Max drawdown-65%-70%
FI Handbook gradeB-B-

Highlighted: the stronger figure on metrics where higher or lower is clearly better.

Growth of $10,000 (5 years, price only)

$10.0K
$20.0K
$30.0K
20222023202420252026
GWWSNA

GWW vs SNA FAQ

Which is bigger, GWW or SNA?

W. W. Grainger (GWW) is larger, with a market cap of $63.6B versus $18.5B for Snap-on, about 3.4 times the size.

Is GWW or SNA cheaper?

On trailing earnings, SNA is cheaper at 18.5x versus 34.4x for GWW. A lower P/E can reflect slower expected growth, so compare growth and margins too.

Which stock performed better over the past year, GWW or SNA?

GWW returned +41.2% over the past year including dividends, versus +5.8% for SNA, through October 23, 2026.

Which pays a higher dividend, GWW or SNA?

SNA yields 2.73% versus 0.74% for GWW.

Full pages: W. W. Grainger · Snap-on