EL vs PG
Estée Lauder Companies (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG) compared side by side. Procter & Gamble (PG) is larger, with a market cap of $373.2B versus $39.4B for Estée Lauder Companies, about 9.5 times the size. On trailing earnings, PG is cheaper at 24.3x versus 217.3x for EL.
Head to head
| Metric | EL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $39.4B | $373.2B |
| P/E (TTM) | 217.3x | 24.3x |
| Forward P/E | 27.6x | 21.7x |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.0B | $87.9B |
| Revenue growth | 6.3% | 4.0% |
| Gross margin | 75.5% | 50.6% |
| Operating margin | 7.0% | 27.1% |
| Free cash flow | $1.3B | $15.1B |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 2.70% |
| 1-year return | +10.8% | +9.6% |
| 5-year return (annual) | -18.6% | +5.4% |
| Max drawdown | -86% | -54% |
| FI Handbook grade | C- | B- |
Highlighted: the stronger figure on metrics where higher or lower is clearly better.
Growth of $10,000 (5 years, price only)
EL vs PG FAQ
Which is bigger, EL or PG?
Procter & Gamble (PG) is larger, with a market cap of $373.2B versus $39.4B for Estée Lauder Companies, about 9.5 times the size.
Is EL or PG cheaper?
On trailing earnings, PG is cheaper at 24.3x versus 217.3x for EL. A lower P/E can reflect slower expected growth, so compare growth and margins too.
Which stock performed better over the past year, EL or PG?
EL returned +10.8% over the past year including dividends, versus +9.6% for PG, through October 23, 2026.
Which pays a higher dividend, EL or PG?
PG yields 2.70% versus 1.29% for EL.
Full pages: Estée Lauder Companies · Procter & Gamble