BDX vs ISRG

Becton Dickinson (BDX) and Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) compared side by side. Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) is larger, with a market cap of $159.8B versus $54.2B for Becton Dickinson, about 2.9 times the size. On trailing earnings, BDX is cheaper at 46.3x versus 54.7x for ISRG.

Head to head

MetricBDXISRG
Market cap$54.2B$159.8B
P/E (TTM)46.3x54.7x
Forward P/E15.0x36.4x
Revenue (TTM)$22.5B$11.6B
Revenue growth5.4%21.7%
Gross margin46.9%66.6%
Operating margin15.7%33.3%
Free cash flow$2.5B$3.2B
Dividend yield2.11%None
1-year return+39.0%-18.0%
5-year return (annual)+2.8%+5.8%
Max drawdown-52%-82%
FI Handbook gradeC+B

Highlighted: the stronger figure on metrics where higher or lower is clearly better.

Growth of $10,000 (5 years, price only)

$5.0K
$10.0K
$15.0K
20222023202420252026
BDXISRG

BDX vs ISRG FAQ

Which is bigger, BDX or ISRG?

Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) is larger, with a market cap of $159.8B versus $54.2B for Becton Dickinson, about 2.9 times the size.

Is BDX or ISRG cheaper?

On trailing earnings, BDX is cheaper at 46.3x versus 54.7x for ISRG. A lower P/E can reflect slower expected growth, so compare growth and margins too.

Which stock performed better over the past year, BDX or ISRG?

BDX returned +39.0% over the past year including dividends, versus -18.0% for ISRG, through October 23, 2026.

Which pays a higher dividend, BDX or ISRG?

BDX yields 2.11%; ISRG does not pay a dividend.

Full pages: Becton Dickinson · Intuitive Surgical