AMAT vs TER
Applied Materials (AMAT) and Teradyne (TER) compared side by side. Applied Materials (AMAT) is larger, with a market cap of $299.4B versus $48.3B for Teradyne, about 6.2 times the size. On trailing earnings, AMAT is cheaper at 32.5x versus 42.4x for TER.
Head to head
| Metric | AMAT | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $299.4B | $48.3B |
| P/E (TTM) | 32.5x | 42.4x |
| Forward P/E | 20.4x | 26.9x |
| Revenue (TTM) | $30.8B | $4.5B |
| Revenue growth | 24.8% | 103.9% |
| Gross margin | 49.4% | 59.2% |
| Operating margin | 33.7% | 33.2% |
| Free cash flow | $5.6B | $799.9M |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 0.17% |
| 1-year return | +66.0% | +113.4% |
| 5-year return (annual) | +23.7% | +22.1% |
| Max drawdown | -85% | -97% |
| FI Handbook grade | B+ | B+ |
Highlighted: the stronger figure on metrics where higher or lower is clearly better.
Growth of $10,000 (5 years, price only)
AMAT vs TER FAQ
Which is bigger, AMAT or TER?
Applied Materials (AMAT) is larger, with a market cap of $299.4B versus $48.3B for Teradyne, about 6.2 times the size.
Is AMAT or TER cheaper?
On trailing earnings, AMAT is cheaper at 32.5x versus 42.4x for TER. A lower P/E can reflect slower expected growth, so compare growth and margins too.
Which stock performed better over the past year, AMAT or TER?
TER returned +113.4% over the past year including dividends, versus +66.0% for AMAT, through October 23, 2026.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMAT or TER?
AMAT yields 0.56% versus 0.17% for TER.
Full pages: Applied Materials · Teradyne