AMAT vs Q
Applied Materials (AMAT) and Qnity Electronics (Q) compared side by side. Applied Materials (AMAT) is larger, with a market cap of $299.4B versus $23.0B for Qnity Electronics, about 13.0 times the size. On trailing earnings, AMAT is cheaper at 32.5x versus 39.2x for Q.
Head to head
| Metric | AMAT | Q |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $299.4B | $23.0B |
| P/E (TTM) | 32.5x | 39.2x |
| Forward P/E | 20.4x | 20.0x |
| Revenue (TTM) | $30.8B | $5.2B |
| Revenue growth | 24.8% | 22.1% |
| Gross margin | 49.4% | 46.2% |
| Operating margin | 33.7% | 22.3% |
| Free cash flow | $5.6B | $825.0M |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 0.29% |
| 1-year return | +66.0% | — |
| 5-year return (annual) | +23.7% | — |
| Max drawdown | -85% | — |
| FI Handbook grade | B+ | C+ |
Highlighted: the stronger figure on metrics where higher or lower is clearly better.
Growth of $10,000 (5 years, price only)
$20.0K
$40.0K
20222023202420252026
AMAT vs Q FAQ
Which is bigger, AMAT or Q?
Applied Materials (AMAT) is larger, with a market cap of $299.4B versus $23.0B for Qnity Electronics, about 13.0 times the size.
Is AMAT or Q cheaper?
On trailing earnings, AMAT is cheaper at 32.5x versus 39.2x for Q. A lower P/E can reflect slower expected growth, so compare growth and margins too.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMAT or Q?
AMAT yields 0.56% versus 0.29% for Q.
Full pages: Applied Materials · Qnity Electronics