ABT vs ISRG
Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) compared side by side. Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is larger, with a market cap of $179.4B versus $159.8B for Intuitive Surgical, about 1.1 times the size. On trailing earnings, ABT is cheaper at 38.6x versus 54.7x for ISRG.
Head to head
| Metric | ABT | ISRG |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $179.4B | $159.8B |
| P/E (TTM) | 38.6x | 54.7x |
| Forward P/E | 17.4x | 36.4x |
| Revenue (TTM) | $48.2B | $11.6B |
| Revenue growth | 14.5% | 21.7% |
| Gross margin | 57.1% | 66.6% |
| Operating margin | 11.3% | 33.3% |
| Free cash flow | $7.4B | $3.2B |
| Dividend yield | 2.43% | None |
| 1-year return | -15.9% | -18.0% |
| 5-year return (annual) | -2.0% | +5.8% |
| Max drawdown | -46% | -82% |
| FI Handbook grade | C+ | B |
Highlighted: the stronger figure on metrics where higher or lower is clearly better.
Growth of $10,000 (5 years, price only)
ABT vs ISRG FAQ
Which is bigger, ABT or ISRG?
Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is larger, with a market cap of $179.4B versus $159.8B for Intuitive Surgical, about 1.1 times the size.
Is ABT or ISRG cheaper?
On trailing earnings, ABT is cheaper at 38.6x versus 54.7x for ISRG. A lower P/E can reflect slower expected growth, so compare growth and margins too.
Which stock performed better over the past year, ABT or ISRG?
ABT returned -15.9% over the past year including dividends, versus -18.0% for ISRG, through October 23, 2026.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABT or ISRG?
ABT yields 2.43%; ISRG does not pay a dividend.
Full pages: Abbott Laboratories · Intuitive Surgical